If for you the nomination and subsequent election in the provincial councils, regional finance in parliament, in exchange for hard seratine (all to prove, however, the tapping and the facts - properly reconnected to each other - this would seem to lead), if the intervention overnight by phone to bypass the law by using his authority and thus pull out of a barracks a young to stop theft, if the foreign-exchange-tank that favors seem to emerge from the reconstruction of the evenings of the Prime Minister, here: if all this is for you privacy, be ', it is clear that you have some mental problem. You can do whatever you want, but if it uses your public position for private matters, I - that I am a member of the public - are authorized to bill. It is not a concept so difficult to understand. But good to see that this is not the last, pecoreccia facet of the conflict of interest that dominates decades now. Another is the pain that you feel when you see a man so adrift, forced to pay for fresh meat and groped be heard as she sings and tells jokes: yes those are private matters, painfully private.
PS: I'm back to waste a little 'bit on the issue because it seems to me that you are testifying arcoriani painfully on the line of privacy defense violated the prime minister, in fact. And leave aside the discussion on that topic as it appears instrumental and inconsistent if waved by those who are on the side of one who has done his private (seppur taroccato) una questione pubblica, a cominciare da "Una storia italiana", do you remember?
0 comments:
Post a Comment